|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Interestingly, the Feldkanone 96 n.A. started it's career as the Feldkanone C/96, a Field Gun with rigid carriage and of surprisingly traditional design, with no shield and the old type of ammunition, with separate cartridges and projectiles. It was all result of the conservatism in the army's leading circles. The Germans had just started to distribute the FK C/96 to the troops, when the French introduced their famous "75", a gun that revolutionized gun design forever. And over-night the French gun made the technically new German C/96 completely obsolete. The problem was, that the German Army had used up most of it's allocated money on the old design, and only way to get a new gun fast, was to subject the C/96 to a major redesign. The job went to Rheinmetall and Krupp, who did a complete overhaul, in principle only keeping the barrel - to save money - and the wheels, but putting in on a new trail, a new hydro-pneumatic recoil system, a shield, and a new breech. The result was the Feldkanone 96 n.A., n.A. standing for neuer Art, "new model". Existing guns were mostly converted, and in addition to this many completely new guns, from the wheels up, were also manufactured. It was a sound design, although not as spectacular as the French "75". The breech was of the single-motion sliding wedge type. The recoil was absorbed by a hydraulic buffer (glycerin) of pretty simple but sturdy design, complemented by four recuperator springs (set in the cradle). The barrel and cradle sat on the straight wheel axle, on which it was elevated and traversed by a simple mechanism, both cranking wheels being to the left, being operated by the gun layer. The trail was of the straight box type, open at the inner end, and with a spur piece with spike permanently attached to the end. It had a shield 3mm thick, set behind the axle, and divided into three pieces, with the upper and lower parts being foldable. (Lower and upper shield was always folded during transport.) The wheels had a double brake, that was used both during transport and as an additional means of securing the piece during firing. The main ammunition was the FKG11 (FeldkanoneGeschoss = Field Gun Projectile) which was a Einheitsgeschoss, i.e. a sort of universal projectile, combining High Explosive with Shrapnel. It's weight was 6.85kg, containing 294 lead 10 gram bullets, and 0.25 kg of FP02, Füll-Pulver 02 i.e. TNT. This was complemented by the FG96, Feldgranate 96, 6.8 kilos heavy, with 0.19 kilos of FP02, plus a pure Shrapnel grenade, also 6.8 kilos heavy, but containing 300 10 gram lead bullets. In addition to this, there came star, smoke and a number of different blue-cross shells i.e. gas projectiles. The fuses used were principally the K.Z.11, a time fuse (at the photo above the fuse to the left) and the later L.K.Z.16 a contact fuse - see the two other, dark coloured fuses. The last were designed to explode immediately on contact, without any delay, hence the nickname given to these grenade by the British soldiers: "whizzbangs". (Colour of the shell to the left: black, with red nose and alloy fuse, colour of centre shell: blue with yellow nose and yellow band at bottom plus blackcoloured alloy fuse, colour of right shell: yellow with blackcoloured alloy fuse.) The design of the Feldkanone 96 n.A. must be seen against the background of German tactical doctrine prior to 1914. The German Army was wholly and fully dedicated to a swift, fast war of maneuver: home before the leaves fall and all that. Therefore mobility and speed of emplacement was given first priority when designing the gun. Which meant that the weight of the gun was kept as low as possible, leading, among other things, that the barrel was comparatively short, giving the gun a pretty low muzzle velocity, compared to other contemporary field guns. But
as the role of the gun was to follow closely the infantry in
it's sweeping movements on the battlefield, giving it close support,
range was secondary. Indeed, firing at ranges over 5.000 meters was considered
both rare and pointless - observation at these ranges was very difficult, among
other things due to the small charges used in the german grenades, which gave
comparatively tiny detonations, hard to spot. Actually, in many Corps firing at
ranges over 5.000 meters was expressly forbidden before the war, considered to
be a waste of ammunition! And
initially, the gun worked as thought. Indeed, it did excellent service, especially on
the Eastern Front. For example during the Battle of the Masurian Lakes, this
comparatively light gun was the only one capable capable of following and
supporting the Infantry of the left flank in their moves through many times
difficult terrain. (Guns like the heavier British 18-pounder or the french
"75" would have had considerable difficulites in the same terrain.)
And during the long, fast marches on the Western Front in the early autumn of
1914, the FK 96 n.A. also proved it's value as a very mobile Field Gun. And the
mostly shrapnel-based ordonance also worked pretty well. But then the War of maneuver ended in the West, and the Trench War came in it's place. And then the short-comings of the piece became obvious. It was superior to the field guns of the enemy armies only in one respect: the mobility, but that was of course not such a big benefit during the stalemate. The field guns of it's opponents could all shoot longer - the French "75", the Russian Putilov 02 and the British 18-pounder. (If ranges over 5.000 meter would be reached, the FK 96 n.A. had to have it's tail dug into the ground, thus increasing the elevation.) In addition to this, the "75" had a higher rate of fire and used better shells, and the 18-pounder bigger ones. In many times, this difference was in practice well near eradicated by the bigger number of german guns, or by the fact that the german field artillery also employed an effective light howitzer, the lFH 98/09. And also, the opponents guns also had problems, for instance the "75" was plagued by misfires, and by falling accuracy at longer ranges. (The "75" also had a more complicated design, making it more difficult to maintain or repair than the pretty sturdy FK 96 n.A..) Still, it was obvious that although the Fk 96 n.A. was far from a flop, it had obvious problems. And while both the French and the British tried to improve the performance of their main gun by simply improving the ordonance, the Germans were the only ones to introduce a completely new gun, the 7.7 cm Feldkanone, which used a longer barrel, plus a howitzer type carriage in order to increase the range of the gun. (The ammunition was the same as the FK 96 n.A..) But this came at a cost. That design was both more complicated and considerably heavier: the weight of a limbered FK was 2256 kilos, as compared with the FK 96:s 1910 kilos. But it is proof of the soundness of the design of the gun, that when war in the spring of 1918 reverted to the type of conflict anticipated before in 1914, i.e. a war of movement, in many batteries the FK 16 was actually replaced by the older but more mobile FK 96. Do you want to
see an authentic piece of WW1 footage, showing a FK 96 n.A. being fired? Click
here! Specifications
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| FK 96 n.A. Walk-Around | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The first 7.7cm Feldkanone 96 n.A. it sits on a small island in the middle of an intersection in the town of Scotch Plains, New Jersey, where it has been photographed by Mike Casale. And this is a very interesting collection of photos, because this is, paradoxically enough, a rather rare gun. He says that "it's in pretty good shape, but sitting outside for many years is causing it to rust out in some places". The grey paint is evidently not the original one. The six next photos have been taken by Philippe Massin, and shows a FK 96 in almost pristine condition, that is kept in the Army Museum in Brussels. And the final five ones are taken by myself, also in the Army Museum in Brussels, but showing a gun - with the upper shield folded - currently tucked away at the Armoured Vehicles display. Mind you: some of these photos are pretty big - but they are worth it! Also: look beneath the photos for a very good re-printed info text on this important gun!
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
7.7cm
Feldkanone 96 n.A. by Leslie F. Thurston |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The
German 7.7 cm field gun was born during the last decade of the nineteenth
century and came of age some ten years later during the first decade of the
present century. Most countries were in the throes of modernising artillery
weapons and it was the field equipments that were receiving more attention than
the heavier weapons, such as coast defence and naval guns. The reason for this
was that while most field artillery weapons had little means of controlling
recoil and required relaying after each shot, the heavier guns utilised the
weights of the fixed mountings combined with crude methods of spring
recuperation to absorb recoil energy and return the piece to battery ready for
the next round. Earlier recoil controlled field carriages were based on similar
systems but few were very efficient in keeping the equipment stable and much
energy was expended by the gun crews in re-laying after each shot.
The
most remarkable achievement of this period was the design adopted in 1897 by the
French Army. This was the famous 75 mm field gun with compressed air
recuperation and many other new features that were years ahead of all rival
equipments. While this weapon was under development and during the years that
French artillery units were being equipped with it, Great Britain, Germany and
the other arms producing nations were striving to build stable recoil controlled
field carriages but were not having the same success as the French. The The best
that Britain could muster was the 15 pounder breech loader in which the gun was
still attached to a rigid carriage and relied on a spade pivoted to the
axle-tree connected by cable to a spring in the trail to prevent the weapon from
running back too far on firing. The first model German 77 mm field gun was
similar in many respects, the only difference being that the spring spade was
built into the end of the trail. Unsatisfactory as this equipment was, rumours
of the marvellous new gun the French were building had caused concern in German
military circles, and, coupled with the success of the French in keeping all
details secret, prompted the Germans to take it into service to replace the
existing outdated 9 cm field gun. As it was customary in those days, the year of
adoption was attached to the title in the official nomenclature to identify the
weapon. It entered service in 1896 one year before the French gun and by the
time the superiority of the latter was realised, large numbers had been issued
which ruled out any possibilities of starting afresh with a completely new
weapon utilising the improved methods of recuperation that began to appear in
later years.
In
the immediate years following 1900 it was clear that weapons produced by the
great gun makers for sale on the open market were far in advance of official
military patterns which were subject to the customary long period of development
testing and evaluation usually demanded by the military authorities. The
inevitable frustrating delays associated with the latter procedure usually left
the traditional arms-producing countries at a certain disadvantage as it was
possible for the smaller states of the world to go straight to the gun makers
and pick up the very latest patterns available. This is what was happening in
Germany. While the 7.7 cm Model 96 became the standard field gun of the German
artillery, Krupp and Erhardt were busily supplying countries all over the world
with vastly superior weapons and ammunition. Even Britain had taken the
unprecedented step of buying modern recoiling 15 pounders from Erhardt after the
lessons learnt from the Boers in South Africa, who had not been slow in taking
advantage of this unique situation in arms supply.
It
is not hard to imagine the bitter controversies that must have raged between
the military on the one hand and the government officials on the other about the
course of action to be taken regarding this very unsatisfactory state of affairs.
In order to remedy the situation work began to convert the weapons to bring
these into line with the equipments of other countries. Although the end product
bore little resemblance to the original piece it still retained the title 7.7 cm
Field Gun 96 but n.A. (neuer Art-new pattern) was added which was usual when
military equipment was modified in some way.
In
the new piece the gun was retained but without trunnions and was fitted with
chase rings and guide pieces to enable it to slide back in the cradle. The
breech mechanism was changed from the earlier two motion sliding wedge pattern
to a single motion type similar to designs produced by Erhardt. To absorb recoil
and return the piece to battery a simple hydraulic buffer and single column of
running up springs was housed in a trough-like cradle below the gun connected to
a horn fixed below the breech. This assembly was mounted on a vertical trunnion
fitted to a sleeve around the axle tree upon which it traversed and elevated by
means of relatively simple operating mechanisms.
The
carriage had a long box trail open at the inner end to permit a maximum
elevation of 16° and allow for 44 inches of recoil. This amount of recoil plus
a low muzzle energy of 241.7 foot tons created a remarkably stable equipment
requiring no further means of steadying the carriage while in action. The brakes
were used for travelling only. To protect the crew from rifle bullets and
shrapnel balls a 4 mm thick shield was provided in front of which two axletree
seats could carry two crew members.
Although
shrapnel shells were at that time accepted standard ammunition for field guns
the Germans had been carrying out trials with a combined shrapnel and high
explosive shell or universal shell (Einheits-Geschoss). Several patterns of
this type of shell were tried and experimented with, the final pattern of
which saw use in the 1914-18 war. Although in some applications such as a
direct hit on a gun shield or air bursts directly above troops, it was
reasonably
successful, the universal shell lacked the tactical value of straight high
explosive or shrapnel shells when used in their normal roles.
Germany
entered the 1914-18 war well equipped with 7.7 cm guns of the new pattern as
well as a formidable array of heavier field guns and howitzers of all calibres
up to 420 mm. Compared to the British 18 pounder (firing a shell some three
pounds heavier) and the rapid firing French 75, the 7.7 cm 96 n.A. could best be
described as a very serviceable gun but slightly lacking in firepower.
Nevertheless
it remained in service throughout the war years and even saw military service
with the Reichswehr in the 1920s, although a newer much improved model the 7.7
cm Field Gun 16 began to appear during 1916.
Ammunition
for the model 96 n.A. was fixed, that is the shell was secured in the case, but
in the model 16 separate loaded rounds were used. This was to enable a greater
range of charges to be used which was one of the disadvantages of the former.
The same cartridge case was used in both types, the only recognisable
difference being the corrugated appearance at the mouth of the fixed cases where
it crimped into the grooves around the base of the shell. These are quite common
in antique shops today and are becoming more sought after as collector's items.
The
wide range of projectiles issued for use in both models of the 77 included high
explosive, shrapnel, universal, star, smoke and many patterns of gas shell. As
the war progressed a new long pattern high explosive shell was introduced
containing a 2 pound bursting charge, which was more than twice the weight of
the explosive in the standard shell of 1915 and five times that contained in the
1914 pattern. With these shells came an instantaneous percussion fuse which
detonated the shell before it had time to bury itself in the ground. Because the
explosion followed the whine of the incoming shell without the slight delay that
was experienced with earlier ammunition,
the new type was given the nickname "Whizz bang" although it is quite likely
that this name was applied to other types of ammunition also. At all events this
nickname was immortalised in a well-known British soldiers' song of the
period. As well as its standard role as a field gun, the 77 was used in many other ways. One of the most improbable was as an anti-aircraft gun in which the whole carriage was mounted on trestles and pointed upwards. The means of traversing and laying were very crude and it is doubtful whether this particular application was very successful. This field improvisation should not be confused with the many more practical adaptations on more formal antiaircraft mountings prepared at the gun factories. As an infantry gun the field carriage was lightened and smaller wheels were fitted. In this form it also served as an anti-tank gun when this particular type of target heralded a new form of warfare. To counter British tanks the standard 1915 pattern high explosive shell was fitted with a hardened steel nose in place of the nose percussion fuse and a special internal percussion fuse was designed to detonate the reduced explosive charge after penetration through the side of the tank, a quite effective method bearing in mind the fairly rudimentary quality of early armour plate. -
Text originally published in Modelworld January 1973
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
How to model this Gun |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Luckily, there are a number of kits available for the one who wants to model this gun. Two Wargaming firms that produce kits are Tumbling Dice and IT Miniatures. The best kits come from the firms of Fine Scale Factory and EMHAR. (Click on the names to see mini-reviews.) If you want to see my model of this gun, click here. |
Gallery | Reviews | Disclaimer |Kitlist
Guest Book | Vote! | Search | Back to Index | Contact